No menu items!
HomeEUROPEFRANCETHE CHANGING FACE OF CLASS ACTIONS IN FRANCE: THE CALM BEFORE THE...

THE CHANGING FACE OF CLASS ACTIONS IN FRANCE: THE CALM BEFORE THE STORM

Published on

spot_img

France’s existing framework for group actions is characterized by its complexity and limitations, resulting in only a handful of cases being initiated, with merely one leading to a final judgment of liability against a defendant. This situation is poised to change, as the French legislature is expected to soon come to a consensus on a bill that will finally incorporate the EU Representative Actions Directive into national law.

Due to ongoing disagreements between the two legislative chambers, the French legislature is already a year behind schedule in enacting a national law in accordance with the EU Directive. Until such legislation is passed, various group actions and litigation funding initiatives remain in limbo. A comparable scenario unfolded in the UK four years ago when the entire sector awaited the Supreme Court’s decision in Merricks v MasterCard, after which a surge of cases was subsequently filed.

In December 2022, the Assembly commenced deliberations on a draft bill aimed at addressing the deficiencies in the regime’s consumer protection framework, in accordance with the EU Directive. This bill proposes to broaden the categories of groups eligible to initiate legal actions and grants courts the authority to impose substantial fines on particularly egregious defendants. Prior to the enactment of this legislation, the chambers must establish a joint committee tasked with formulating a compromise text, which will subsequently be presented to both chambers for further voting.

Currently, the 2014 French legislation remains in effect. This law restricts legal actions to low-value, opt-in consumer lawsuits that are limited to claims for material damages and can only be initiated by government-recognized consumer organizations and labor unions. Among the just 35 cases filed under this law, 25 are still in progress. Three cases were dismissed based on their merits, while three others settled. Additionally, two cases were deemed inadmissible, and one was withdrawn. The sole case that culminated in a final ruling involved the major pharmaceutical company Sanofi in 2022, concerning the adverse effects of a particular medication.

author avatar
CAI-STAFF

Latest articles

DUTCH FOUNDATION RULED INADMISSIBLE IN WAMCA CASE AGAINST STELLANTIS

The FCIRS Foundation has lodged claims against Stellantis under the WAMCA, claiming that Stellantis'...

Booking.com Faces Consumer Claim in The Netherlands

The Dutch Consumers’ Association (Consumentenbond) and the Consumers Competition Claims Foundation (CCC) have initiated...

HOTELS FILE COLLECTIVE ACTION IN THE NETHERLANDS AGAINST BOOKING.COM

Hotels throughout Europe are being urged to participate in a class action against Booking.com...

ECONOMIC STUDY SUGGESTS COLLECTIVE ACTIONS MAY COST THE UK ECONOMY 18 BILLION GBP

A recent economic study released today, titled The Impact of Increased Mass Litigation in...

More like this

DUTCH FOUNDATION RULED INADMISSIBLE IN WAMCA CASE AGAINST STELLANTIS

The FCIRS Foundation has lodged claims against Stellantis under the WAMCA, claiming that Stellantis'...

Booking.com Faces Consumer Claim in The Netherlands

The Dutch Consumers’ Association (Consumentenbond) and the Consumers Competition Claims Foundation (CCC) have initiated...

HOTELS FILE COLLECTIVE ACTION IN THE NETHERLANDS AGAINST BOOKING.COM

Hotels throughout Europe are being urged to participate in a class action against Booking.com...